Case 1801243/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Enright v Hyundai L & C GmbH — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801243/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Enright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. Employment Judge Maidment found that Hyundai L & C GmbH had acted in breach of contract by deducting £500 from expenses due and paid to Miss K Enright. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £500.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining complaints were dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them. No further detail is given in the extracted text about the nature of those complaints or any separate remedy for them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent acted in breach of contract by deducting £500 from expenses due and paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's remaining complaints were dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them. The judgment does not specify those complaints further. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.