Case 1801251/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gobbato v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801251/2020
- Decision date
- 29 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morgan
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Gobbato
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was the remedy judgment following the Tribunal’s earlier liability decision of 2 December 2020, which had already upheld unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and failure to pay accrued holiday entitlement. At the start of the remedy hearing, the Tribunal allowed the Respondent to rely only on evidence about a March 2020 redundancy exercise and an April 2020 commission issue; it did not permit relitigation of the company-vehicle damage issue because that had already been determined.
The Tribunal adopted its earlier findings and made further findings that, during employment, the Claimant was paid basic pay plus commission and had a company car; after dismissal he had temporary employment until April 2020; and he did not look for non-sales roles. It accepted that the Respondent had considered a redundancy-type process in March 2020 because of pandemic-related trading conditions, but it did not accept that this meant the Claimant would inevitably have been dismissed in that exercise. It also rejected the Respondent’s case that commission participation had been removed by a contractual variation in April 2020, noting that the Respondent was still using commission to recruit in September 2020.
On mitigation, the Tribunal held that the Respondent had not shown that the Claimant failed to mitigate his loss by not applying outside sales. Applying section 123 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the earlier Polkey and contribution findings, the Tribunal assessed the Claimant’s weekly pay at £871 gross and £663.08 net, fixed the basic award at £2,178.90, awarded £450 for loss of statutory rights and £4,000 for loss of the company vehicle, and concluded that the recoverable loss period was 20 months. It recorded that the recoupment regulations applied, with a prescribed period from 11 November 2019 to 26 March 2021 and a prescribed amount of £24,322.83.
After the parties adjourned to agree the arithmetic, the Tribunal entered judgment for total compensation of £35,414 for unfair dismissal, £1,834.10 for unlawful deduction from wages, and £944.66 for accrued holiday pay. It made no award of interest.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal assessed a basic award of £2,178.90 and agreed total compensation for unfair dismissal at £35,414 after discounts, uplift and grossing up. | Upheld | — | £35,414 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The earlier liability finding was upheld; no challenge was made to the sum claimed. | Upheld | — | £1,834 |
| Holiday pay | The award was limited to 8 days of accrued unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £945 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £38,193
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,179
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 ERA 1996
- Polkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.