Case 1801269/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms S Younis (Solicitor) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801269/2022
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing in public on 29 November 2022, before Employment Judge Davies sitting by CVP, the tribunal determined that Mr C Keating’s complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded against Bierley Community Association Ltd.
The judgment does not set out the underlying facts or legal reasoning for the finding in the extracted text provided. It records only that the unfair dismissal complaint was upheld and that compensation was not determined at this stage.
The tribunal stated that it would decide what, if any, compensation should be awarded for unfair dismissal at the final hearing of the remaining complaints, in accordance with case management orders made on the same day. No monetary award is recorded in this preliminary judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. It did not determine compensation at this preliminary hearing; instead, it said compensation for unfair dismissal would be decided at the final hearing of the remaining complaints in accordance with the case management orders made the same day. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.