Case 1801271/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Pawley v Hanley's Restaurant Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801271/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms H Pawley
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 29 January 2021, the tribunal gave both respondents an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why their response should not be struck out for failure to comply with the tribunal's orders of 19 November 2020, 15 December 2020 and 23 December 2020, and because the response had not been actively pursued.
The respondents made no written representations and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the response from both respondents on 1 March 2021. The judgment also records that the respondents would remain entitled to notice of any future hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying merits. It records that the respondents' response was struck out because they had not complied with tribunal orders dated 19 November 2020, 15 December 2020 and 23 December 2020, and had not actively pursued the response. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.