Case 1801281/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D J Kerridge v Pure Technology Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801281/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ROSTANT Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D J Kerridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D J Kerridge brought claims against Pure Technology Group Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of sick pay and holiday pay, and for failure to provide a correct job description. The judgment records that both claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
No merits findings are stated in the extracted judgment, and no monetary award is recorded. The decision is signed by Employment Judge Rostant and dated 17 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to claims of unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of sick pay and holiday pay; the extracted text says these were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim described as failure to provide a correct job description; the judgment says it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.