Case 1801307/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801307/2020
- Decision date
- 24 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Ms H Brown, Ms GM Flemming
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Leeds on 22-24 February 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade, sitting with Ms H Brown and Ms GM Flemming. Mr T Primus represented himself and Yorkshire Housing Limited was represented by Mr P Sangha of counsel.
The tribunal found that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was well founded and succeeded. It also found that the respondent contravened section 15 of the Equality Act by dismissing the claimant, so the disability discrimination claim succeeded on that basis.
The claimant's reasonable adjustment complaints were dismissed. The judgment does not set out the detailed reasoning in the extracted text, but it records those separate outcomes plainly.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £4,653, a compensatory award of £3,906, injury to feelings of £12,000, and interest of £1,458, making a total award of £22,017. The award is recorded as a single total and is not apportioned between the successful claims in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment did not apportion the award between the successful claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment did not apportion the award between the successful claims; the tribunal held that the respondent contravened section 15 of the Equality Act by dismissing the claimant. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment did not apportion the award between the successful claims; the claimant's reasonable adjustment complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,017
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,653
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,906
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.