Case 1801320/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Castle v Chique Makeovers & Photography Ltd Introduction The parties having taken part in Judicial Mediation And by consent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801320/2020
- Decision date
- 4 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Castle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the parties took part in Judicial Mediation and, by consent, had agreed confidential terms of settlement on 4 August 2020. Mr Castle then withdrew his claims before Employment Judge JM Wade.
Following that withdrawal, the tribunal stated that the claims were dismissed. No substantive findings on liability were made and no monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the parties agreed confidential terms of settlement on the day of judgment and that Mr Castle withdrew his claims before the Employment Judge, after which the claims were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the parties agreed confidential terms of settlement on the day of judgment and that Mr Castle withdrew his claims before the Employment Judge, after which the claims were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the parties agreed confidential terms of settlement on the day of judgment and that Mr Castle withdrew his claims before the Employment Judge, after which the claims were dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.