Case 1801325/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Mullen v Joda Freight Limited FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801325/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore
- Panel members
- Mr M Taj, Mr R Webb
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Mullen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Leeds by video link on 12 October 2020, Employment Judge S Shore sat with Mr M Taj and Mr R Webb. Mr N Mullen, appearing in person, brought claims against Joda Freight Limited for automatic unfair dismissal under section 152(1)(a) and (b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and for breach of contract.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. The judgment records that the claimant's automatic unfair dismissal claims and breach of contract claim failed, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Automatic unfair dismissal claim pursuant to section 152(1)(a) and (b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 152(1)(a) and (b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.