Case 1801336/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Brant v Xorba Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801336/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Brant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment given on the papers. Employment Judge Brain found that Xorba Services Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr T Brant's wages, had dismissed him in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £615.95 gross for the wage deduction claim, £690.75 gross for breach of contract, and £221.04 gross for holiday pay. It also ordered payment of £100 for bank charges incurred by the claimant as a result of the unauthorised deduction from wages.
The total payable was recorded as £1,627.74, to be paid within 14 days of the date of the judgment. The hearing listed for 28 April 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £615.95 gross. | Upheld | — | £616 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £690.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £691 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £221.04 gross. | Upheld | — | £221 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,628
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.