Case 1801345/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2024
- Case reference
- 1801345/2023
- Decision date
- 16 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms J Blesic, Mr T Fox
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds on 28, 29 and 30 November 2023 and 15 February 2024, before Employment Judge Miller with two panel members. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded and succeeded. The written record does not set out the factual findings, reasoning, or any remedy determination; it notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is well-founded and succeeds. Written reasons were not included in the text supplied. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.