Case 1801352/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Frazer v Coach Pro UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801352/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Frazer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Frazer’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against Coach Pro UK Ltd was heard at Leeds by CVP on 15 June 2023. The respondent did not attend. Employment Judge Tegerdine gave oral reasons at the hearing and the written record notes that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded. It found that the amount properly payable to the claimant in respect of wages for the period between 28 November 2022 and 1 December 2022 was £288.00.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £288.00 on or before 29 June 2023. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and awarded the gross sum of £288.00 for wages for the period between 28 November 2022 and 1 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £288 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £288
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.