Case 1801360/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Merugu v Capita Employee Benefits Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801360/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Merugu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a withdrawal-rule decision. Employment Judge Rostant recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mrs S Merugu, against Capita Employee Benefits Limited.
The extracted text does not include any substantive findings on the merits, any liability analysis, or any remedy assessment. It also does not identify the pleaded issues beyond the case listing context, so no legal test or compensatory calculation is recorded in the judgment text provided.
On that basis, the only outcome available from the judgment itself is that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying breach of contract particulars; it records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. Claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying working time particulars; it records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. Claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.