Case 1801363/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Stockwell v Larizia Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801363/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Stockwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Leeds by CVP on 9 August 2022, before Employment Judge Maidment, the respondent did not attend and no appearance was entered. The judgment records that Miss J Stockwell was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £16,048.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the respondent to pay gross notice pay of £6,696.47. In addition, it ordered payment of £3,278.76 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement as at the termination of employment. The judgment does not set out any further issue or reduction of those amounts in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £16,048 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract and ordered payment of gross notice pay. | Upheld | — | £6,696 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement at the termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £3,279 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,023
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.