Case 1801368/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Scott v Skin Solutions — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801368/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 29 March 2022, the Tribunal gave Mrs L Scott an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out because she did not have the two years required for an unfair dismissal claim. She did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The reasons state that the claim was struck out on that basis. The judgment also records that the claims relating to notice pay, holiday pay and other payments would be listed for a hearing if the claimant showed cause that they were arguable.
On review, the Tribunal ordered the claimant to show cause why her remaining complaints should not be struck out in light of the respondent's response that all sums had been paid. It directed her to write to the Tribunal and the respondent by 6 May 2022 if she disputed that position.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant did not have the two years required for an unfair dismissal claim and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 29 March 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.