Case 1801370/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Harding (counsel) For the v Ms Lawrence (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801370/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Harding (counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by telephone on 16 May 2023, Employment Judge Davies recorded that several matters were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. Those included any claim against Ms Thersby and Ms Hinchcliffe, any claim brought in a claim form other than claim 1801370/2023, all complaints of age discrimination, all complaints of sex discrimination, and all complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages.
The judgment also dismissed, on withdrawal, any complaint of disability discrimination based on a disability other than the claimant's knee injury and the ongoing effects of that. The wording left open the claimant's disability discrimination case so far as it related to the knee injury and its ongoing effects.
The remaining claims, as amended at the preliminary hearing, were directed to proceed under the case management orders made on 16 May 2023. No liability findings on the remaining claims and no monetary remedy were determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismissed, on withdrawal, any complaint of disability discrimination based on a disability other than the claimant's knee injury and the ongoing effects of that. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Any claim brought against named Respondents Ms Thersby and Ms Hinchcliffe was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Any claim brought in a claim form other than claim 1801370/2023 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | All complaints of age discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | All complaints of sex discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.