Case 1801380/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lemboye v Care Worldwide (Bradford) Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801380/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Lemboye
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a reconsideration decision only. The claimant, Mr A Lemboye, applied on 21 November 2023 for reconsideration of the judgment that had been sent to the parties on 13 November 2023. Employment Judge Bright refused that application.
The tribunal said there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. Its reason was that the claimant's representative had not said anything in the reconsideration application that had not already been said, or could have been said, at the preliminary hearing on 13 November 2023.
The judge recorded that the original judgment had been made on the basis of the claimant's evidence and the representations made by the parties' representatives at that preliminary hearing. No substantive remedy was awarded in this reconsideration decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment does not determine a substantive employment claim. It refuses the claimant's application dated 21 November 2023 for reconsideration of the judgment sent on 13 November 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 72
- no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.