Case 1801400/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Antich and Sons (Huddersfield) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801400/2023
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Russell brought a claim against Antich and Sons (Huddersfield) Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages. At the hearing on 27 July 2023, Employment Judge Brain held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £270, described in the judgment as the amount of the unauthorised deduction calculated gross. Payment was directed to be made on or before 10 August 2023.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further findings or separate remedy components are set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £270, described as the amount of the deduction calculated gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £270
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.