Case 1801418/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hannaby v Third Energy UK Gas Ltd. Third Energy Onshore Ltd. AT A HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801418/2020
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Ms J Lancaster, Mr M Elwen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hannaby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lancaster sat with Ms J Lancaster and Mr M Elwen at Hull on 26 and 27 January 2021. The judgment records that the correct respondent was the first named company only, Third Energy UK Gas Ltd.
The tribunal then dismissed the claim. The extracted text does not give further reasons, findings on liability, or any monetary award.
No remedy was recorded in the judgment text provided, and no legal test or statutory provision was named in the extracted extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not set out the claim particulars. The case listing category supplied with the record identifies the matter as disability discrimination, but the judgment text itself only records that the correct respondent was Third Energy UK Gas Ltd and that the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.