Case 1801446/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Howard v Two Transport Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801446/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Howard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss N Howard against Two Transport Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £471.32, calculated as £1,083.72 plus £141.20 less £753.60 already received.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £180.62 in damages. In a further finding, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £184.73.
The hearing listed for 5 May 2020 was cancelled. The judgment records only these monetary orders and does not identify any separate award structure beyond the amounts attached to each finding.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the stated sum. | Upheld | — | £471 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £181 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the stated sum. | Upheld | — | £185 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £837
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.