Case 1801446/2023 · Employment Tribunal
William Odell First v Randstad Solutions Limited Second Respondent: The North Yorkshire Council Third Respondent: Matrix SCM Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801446/2023
- Decision date
- 25 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bunting Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
William Odell First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private telephone hearing in Leeds on 25 May 2023 before Employment Judge Bunting, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims were withdrawn against the first respondent, Randstad Solutions Limited, and therefore dismissed. The claims listed in that order were automatic unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, whistleblowing detriment, health and safety detriment, and holiday pay.
The same order recorded that, as against the third respondent, Matrix SCM Limited, the claimant's whole claim was withdrawn and therefore dismissed. As against the second respondent, The North Yorkshire Council, the claims for automatic unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and holiday pay were withdrawn and therefore dismissed, while the whistleblowing detriment and health and safety detriment claims were stated to continue. The judgment contained no findings on the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal. The judgment recorded withdrawal and dismissal against the first and third respondents, and withdrawal against the second respondent as to this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Withdrawn and therefore dismissed against the first and third respondents, and withdrawn against the second respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Withdrawn and dismissed against the first and third respondents, but the judgment stated that this detriment claim would continue against the second respondent. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Health and safety detriment. Withdrawn and dismissed against the first and third respondents, but the judgment stated that this claim would continue against the second respondent. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn and therefore dismissed against the first and third respondents, and withdrawn against the second respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.