Case 1801458/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Jobe v Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust HELD by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Leeds — 2024
- Case reference
- 1801458/2024
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Jobe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Jobe was dismissed on 21 June 2023, so the three-month time limit for an unfair dismissal claim expired on 20 September 2023. She contacted ACAS on 21 September 2023 and presented her tribunal claim on 29 February 2024. The tribunal recorded that she had been supported by the RCN during the disciplinary and appeal processes and had been told about the need to bring a claim within three months, but it found that she chose not to issue the claim sooner rather than being unaware of the time limit.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s explanations for the delay. It found no medical evidence showing that her state of mind prevented her from filing in time, noted that her husband’s illness did not prevent presentation within the relevant three months, and found that the eviction relied on by the claimant had occurred in October 2022, well before the dismissal. It also noted that the claimant received permanent accommodation by the end of December 2023, still two months before she issued proceedings.
Applying section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the authorities it cited on reasonable practicability, including Dedman, Wall’s Meat, Porter and Sterling, the tribunal held that the claim was not brought within three months, that it was not satisfied it was not reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time, and that the claimant had not discharged the burden of showing why the claim was late. It therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint and struck it out and dismissed it as applicable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed from employment as a staff nurse on 21 June 2023. The tribunal held the unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time under section 111(2) ERA 1996, found it was not reasonably practicable to present it within three months, and held the tribunal had no jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonable practicability test
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Wall’s Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Sterling v United Learning Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.