Case 1801462/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss EJ Bradbury v G&D Hairstyles Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801462/2023
- Decision date
- 3 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradbury Respondent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss EJ Bradbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a rule 21 determination on the material before the tribunal. On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,100.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,050. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £840.
The unfair dismissal claim did not proceed to a substantive determination because it was withdrawn and was dismissed on that basis. The judgment records the hearing listed for 9 August 2023 as cancelled and the judgment was sent to the parties on 3 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,100. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,050. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £840. | Upheld | — | £840 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon its withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,990
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.