Case 1801463/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Joaquin Ibañez Ruiz v Owston Estate Company Limited t/a Owston Hall Hotel — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801463/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joaquin Ibañez Ruiz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJoaquin Ibañez Ruiz was employed by Owston Estate Company Limited t/a Owston Hall Hotel as Head Green Keeper from 28 March 2018 until 29 February 2020. At the telephone hearing on 2 June 2020 before Employment Judge Evans sitting alone, the Claimant applied to amend his claim to add complaints about rent deductions during the employment. The Tribunal refused that amendment, applying the Selkent guidance, because it raised a new factual issue, was out of time, and was made at the start of the final hearing when the Respondent was not prepared to meet it.
The remaining issue was the Claimant's complaint that the Respondent had unlawfully deducted his February 2020 wages. Mr Parker conceded that £2,583.33 had been withheld and that the deduction was unlawful. The Tribunal therefore found the unlawful deduction complaint well founded under sections 13 and 24 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of the deducted sum.
On remedy, the Tribunal accepted the Claimant's evidence that the late payment meant he could not immediately pay the deposit on accommodation arranged in Spain, so he spent a week seeking alternative accommodation and started his new employment one week later than planned. The Tribunal accepted a net loss of €550 and, using the agreed exchange rate of £1 to €1.12, awarded £491.07 for financial loss. It did not award the £1,410.32 borrowed from the Claimant's mother because that amount was a loan rather than a loss attributable to the unlawful deduction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Claimant's late application to amend the claim to include rent deductions was refused under Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore. The remaining complaint concerned the February 2020 wages deduction; the Respondent conceded that £2,583.33 had been deducted unlawfully. The Tribunal also awarded £491.07 for financial loss caused by the late payment. The separate claim for £1,410.32 borrowed from the Claimant's mother was rejected because it was a loan, not a loss caused by the unlawful deduction. | Upheld | — | £3,074 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,074
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £491
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.