Case 1801476/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Parkin v Industrial Fabrication and Site Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801476/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Parkin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Parkin brought claims against Industrial Fabrication and Site Services Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages and payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday leave. The respondent did not appear. The tribunal held that the claims had been presented outside the time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to bring them within time and that they were brought within a period the tribunal considered reasonable.
Both substantive claims were found well founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £54.25 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages and £1,232.00 gross for accrued but untaken holiday leave. It further directed that statutory deductions for tax and National Insurance be made from those sums.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £2,240.00 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total award was £3,526.25, and the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £54 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday leave. | Upheld | — | £1,232 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,526
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period
- Section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.