Case 1801500/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Pearson and others (see Schedule) v Bonds Heavy Castings Limited ( in Administration ) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801500/2020
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Pearson and others (see Schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well-founded. The judgment is a Rule 21 decision in favour of the Claimants against Bonds Heavy Castings Limited (in administration).
The tribunal ordered that the Respondent shall pay the Claimants for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 27 December 2020. The extracted text does not state any monetary amount for that protected award, so no figure can be recorded from the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment states that the complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well-founded. It also records a protected period of 90 days beginning on 27 December 2020, but no monetary sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.