Case 1801501/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Benn v Boots Management Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801501/2023
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Benn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21 after the respondent did not contest the unauthorised deduction from wages part of the claim. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £46.96. The claimant withdrew any additional complaint, and any other complaint was dismissed. The hearing listed for 18 August 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent did not contest this part of the claim and that an unauthorised deduction from wages was made. | Upheld | — | £47 |
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew any additional complaint and that any other complaint was dismissed, but it does not identify the nature of any additional complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.