Case 1801514/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wilson v Fusion Systems Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801514/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D N Jones struck out the claim on 18 August 2020 under rule 37. The judgment says that by a letter dated 3 August 2020 the Tribunal gave Mr P Wilson an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the Tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text records no substantive findings on liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a strike out under rule 37 for the claim not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not separate any distinct findings on the merits of the disability discrimination claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a strike out under rule 37 for the claim not being actively pursued. The extracted text does not separate any distinct findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.