Case 1801514/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Frazer v Coach Pro UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801514/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Frazer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds, before Employment Judge Tegerdine, determined Mr G Frazer’s claim against Coach Pro UK Ltd on the papers recorded in the written judgment. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Mr Frazer the gross sum of £655.50, identified as the amount of the unauthorised deduction from wages properly payable for the period between 28 November 2022 and 3 December 2022. The decision also required payment by 29 June 2023. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £655.50, stated to relate to wages for the period between 28 November 2022 and 3 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £656
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.