Case 1801538/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Horsfall Miss S Phillips v Fieldside Business Support Limited (in Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801538/2017
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Horsfall Miss S Phillips
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that in case numbers 1801538/2017 and 1801539/2017, the proceedings were dismissed after the claimants withdrew their claims. The respondent is identified as Fieldside Business Support Limited (in Administration), and the judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability.
No remedy was awarded, and the extract contains no separate compensation, redundancy, or wage figures. On the text provided, the tribunal made a procedural disposal only, with no merits determination recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing as the protective award element; the judgment text itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing; the judgment text itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing; the judgment text itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.