Case 1801550/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Noble v Mr P Stott t/a Ingrams Solicitors and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801550/2018
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Noble
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in case numbers 1801550/2018 and 2404310/2018. The tribunal dismissed the proceedings against the first respondent, Mr P Stott t/a Ingrams Solicitors, and did not record any other substantive claim outcome against that respondent.
The tribunal found that the claimant, Ms K Noble, was entitled to be paid by the second respondent, Lawyers Incorporated Limited, a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The sum awarded was £3,409.00. No separate breakdown of the award into different heads was given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment was issued under Rule 21. The proceedings were dismissed against the first respondent, Mr P Stott t/a Ingrams Solicitors. The claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the second respondent, Lawyers Incorporated Limited. | Upheld | — | £3,409 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,409
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.