Case 1801576/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Woodland McKenney v Sirius Technology Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801576/2022
- Decision date
- 18 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Woodland McKenney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages well founded and ordered Sirius Technology Limited to pay £5,769.20, subject to any deductions for tax and national insurance. It also upheld the breach of contract claim for reimbursement of travel expenses and ordered payment of £241.63.
The holiday pay claim was also well founded, with an award of £576.92 subject to any deductions for tax and national insurance. The breach of contract claim for reimbursement of laptop costs was not well founded and was dismissed. The claimant's automatic unfair dismissal claim for asserting a statutory right was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award ordered at £5,769.20 less any deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,769 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for reimbursement of travel expenses; awarded £241.63. | Upheld | — | £242 |
| Holiday pay | Award ordered at £576.92 less any deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in relation to reimbursement of laptop costs was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim for asserting a statutory right was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,588
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.