Case 1801578/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ms D Waspe — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801578/2022
- Decision date
- 11 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 23 March 2022. The respondent did not present a response, and Employment Judge Davies determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The only claim recorded in the judgment was for unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,618.80 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and National Insurance due on that payment. The hearing listed for 31 May 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a response and the tribunal determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The sum ordered was £1,618.80 gross; the claimant was responsible for any tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,619 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,619
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.