Case 1801601/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McGlone v Edwin Snowden (2018) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801601/2020
- Decision date
- 15 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McGlone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a Rule 21 judgment, the tribunal ordered Edwin Snowden (2018) Limited to pay Mr D McGlone £3,103.45 gross for an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pay due from 1 to 24 February 2020. It also ordered £396.96 gross for an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued holiday pay due for the part holiday year from 1 January to 24 February 2020.
The tribunal further found that Mr McGlone had been wrongfully dismissed without notice in breach of contract and awarded damages of £10,065.85 gross. The judgment records no separate award for interest or any other remedy, and the total of the three sums ordered is £13,566.26 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of pay due from 1 to 24 February 2020. | Upheld | — | £3,103 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of accrued holiday pay due for the part holiday year from 1 January to 24 February 2020. | Upheld | — | £397 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal without notice in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £10,066 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,566
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.