Case 1801606/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Manjavidze v Oleria Limited HELD by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) at Leeds — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801606/2023
- Decision date
- 7 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Manjavidze
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Leeds on 24 May 2023 before Employment Judge Shulman, the parties were recorded as the claimant appearing in person and the respondent appearing through a consultant. The judgment states that, by consent, the respondent would pay the claimant £416.10 by way of holiday pay and £1,298.18 by way of unauthorised deduction of wages.
No liability findings or written reasons are provided in the judgment, which notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The record therefore shows a consent disposal rather than a reasoned adjudication on the merits of either claim.
The total sum recorded by the judgment is £1,714.28. No separate award components such as basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings are mentioned.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent shall pay £416.10 by way of holiday pay. | Settled | — | £416 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent shall pay £1,298.18 by way of unauthorised deduction of wages. | Settled | — | £1,298 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,714
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.