Case 1801610/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lawrence, Accountant For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801610/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Lawrence, Accountant For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an appeal by Minster Fisheries Ltd against a notice of underpayment and penalty issued by the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The original notice dated 28 February 2019 referred to arrears of £838.71 and a penalty of £1,603.14. After the arrears were paid, a replacement notice was issued on 3 July 2019 showing a reduced penalty of £546.90, and both parties accepted that nothing further was due under the notice and that there was in fact an amount due back to the appellant because of the reduced penalty.
The tribunal found that Mr Jack Lindon was an employee of the appellant company under a contract of employment and therefore a worker for the purposes of the Act and Regulations. It rejected any suggestion that the employment relationship was a sham or pretence. The tribunal also held that there was no small business exemption to the National Minimum Wage provisions. Regulation 57 did not apply because the work in issue was running a fish and chip shop, not work done in relation to a family household, and the Respondent had not counted household tasks in its calculation.
The decisive issue was Regulation 58. The tribunal accepted that Mr Lindon was a member of Miss Chauda’s family, resided in the family home and participated in running the family business. It held that Minster Fisheries Ltd was, in substance, a family business because its officers and shareholders were members of the Chauda family, and that nothing in the Regulations prevented a limited company from being treated as a family business for this purpose. On that basis the arrangement fell within the family business exclusion, the appeal succeeded, and the notice of underpayment and penalty was rescinded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Appeal under section 19C(1)(a) of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 against a notice of underpayment and penalty. The tribunal held the appeal was well founded and rescinded the notice dated 3 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 19C National Minimum Wage Act 1998
- regulation 57 National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
- regulation 58 National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.