Case 1801620/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Murray v Belzona Polymerics Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801620/2020
- Decision date
- 3 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 19 March 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr C Murray an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that the issue was that he had been employed for less than two years.
Mr Murray did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining breach of contract claim continued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal considered the claimant had been employed for less than two years, and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out letter dated 19 March 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.