Case 1801622/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Vella v Mr P Nowell t/a PN Decor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801622/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ROSTANT Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Vella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims for failure to pay a redundancy payment, breach of contract, failure to pay holiday pay for holiday year 2018/2019, and age discrimination in respect of being left unsupervised were dismissed upon withdrawal. Those claims were not determined on their merits in this judgment.
The claim for breach of section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, namely failure to provide written terms of employment, was upheld by consent. The judgment states that compensation would be assessed at a hearing of the remaining substantive issues, so no monetary award is fixed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment refers to holiday pay for holiday year 2018/2019. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal; the allegation was age discrimination in respect of being left unsupervised. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Other | Claim under s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 for failure to provide written terms of employment was upheld by consent. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.