Case 1801631/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Abbiss v Housing & Care 21 — 2018
- Case reference
- 1801631/2017
- Decision date
- 26 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Abbiss
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short rule 52 withdrawal judgment in case 1801631/2017, dated 26 March 2018. Employment Judge Wade Date recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by Mrs K Abbiss.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claims, any liability decision, or any remedy award. It is a procedural disposal only.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim; no merits findings or claim-by-claim reasoning are given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim; no merits findings or claim-by-claim reasoning are given. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim; no merits findings or claim-by-claim reasoning are given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records dismissal following withdrawal of the claim; no merits findings or claim-by-claim reasoning are given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.