Case 1801637/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Hall v Leaves and Beans Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801637/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 6 April 2022, the tribunal gave Mr Hall an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The tribunal recorded two reasons for considering strike out: first, that he had already brought an earlier unfair dismissal complaint which had been struck out because he lacked the two-year qualifying service; and second, that the other claims were already being pursued in case number 1801122/22.
Mr Hall did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded or recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons refer to an earlier unfair dismissal complaint that had already been struck out because the claimant lacked two years' qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal said the remaining claims were already being pursued in case number 1801122/22 and treated the present claim as an abuse of process. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.