Case 1801649/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Moffat v Elan Fire Protection Systems Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801649/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rawlinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Moffat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time and no extension application had been received. The Employment Judge recorded that recent correspondence showed the respondent had received the claim papers, and that a determination could properly be made on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,704.96. The extracted judgment does not record any separate finding on a working time claim or any breakdown of the award beyond that single sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,704.96. No separate working time finding is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,705 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,705
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.