Case 1801651/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Miss L Ullyott v Stronglife Care Limited AT A HEARING — 2022

Case reference: 1801651/2022
Decision date: 7 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss L Ullyott

Respondent

Stronglife Care Limited AT A HEARING

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing in Leeds by CVP on 7 September 2022 before Employment Judge Lancaster, the tribunal considered Miss L Ullyott's claims against Stronglife Care Limited. It held that it was reasonably practicable for the unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages and accrued holiday pay claims to have been presented on or before 28 March 2022, but they were not presented by then.

Those four claims were therefore dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them. No monetary award was made in this judgment.

The tribunal also recorded that the disability discrimination claims were not presented in time, but it decided that it was just and equitable to extend time. Those claims were allowed to continue to a final hearing, and this judgment did not determine their merits.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present the unfair dismissal claim on or before 28 March 2022, but the Claimant did not do so, so the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—
Wrongful dismissal	The tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present the wrongful dismissal claim on or before 28 March 2022, but the Claimant did not do so, so the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present the unauthorised deductions from wages claim on or before 28 March 2022, but the Claimant did not do so, so the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—
Holiday pay	The tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present the accrued holiday pay claim on or before 28 March 2022, but the Claimant did not do so, so the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	The tribunal found the disability discrimination claims were not presented in time, but it was just and equitable to extend time, so they would continue to a final hearing. No merits finding was made in this judgment.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.