Case 1801657/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v SK Recruitment Agency Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801657/2020
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unpaid holiday pay arising from work with the respondent agency between 2017 and 2019. He said he had worked as a labourer on a clean-room construction project, signed contracts in 2017 and 2018 describing him as self-employed, and received CIS pay statements showing only basic-rate income tax deducted at source. He later obtained a UTR and completed a self-assessment tax return for 2018/2019. The tribunal accepted his oral evidence and found him to be a reliable and honest witness.
The tribunal held that the claim was out of time. It found that the last time the claimant could have sought or enjoyed paid holiday with the agency was April or early May 2019, and that a claim presented in time would have needed to be brought in late July or early August 2019. Applying the time-limit provisions under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 or section 23(2) to (4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the judge considered whether it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time.
On that question, the tribunal found that paid holidays and rights connected with them are generally known and readily discoverable by a person with connectivity and literacy, and that the claimant also had access to his sister's specialist accounting knowledge. It therefore concluded that it was reasonably doable for him to have brought a claim during his work with the agency or within three months after it ended. The tribunal dismissed the holiday pay claim and did not decide whether, on the facts, the claimant was properly a worker entitled to holiday pay or self-employed and not entitled to it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed because it was presented outside the relevant time limits. The tribunal did not decide whether the claimant was a worker entitled to holiday pay or self-employed and not entitled to it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 23(2) to (4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.