Case 1801661/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Patel v Focused Support Independence Project – 10787546 and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801661/2022
- Decision date
- 27 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr M Patel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Hull by video on 19 January 2023, Employment Judge Miller considered the respondents' applications to strike out the claimant's claims. The applications were made on two grounds: failure to comply with an order of the tribunal and alleged lack of reasonable prospects of success.
The tribunal refused both applications. The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards were decided in this judgment.
The written record notes that the reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note appended to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondents' applications that the claimant's claims be struck out, on the grounds of failure to comply with a tribunal order and having no reasonable prospects of success, were refused. The claimant's claims were not struck out. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.