Case 1801666/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Birch v Mr Mason Small trading as MMS UK Introduction The parties having taken part in Judicial Mediation And by consent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801666/2020
- Decision date
- 25 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Birch
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe parties had taken part in judicial mediation and, by consent, the claimant's title was amended to Ms D Birch. The tribunal recorded that the complaints in relation to notice pay, holiday pay, Equality Act complaints and protected disclosure complaints were dismissed on withdrawal.
The unfair dismissal complaint was undefended and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £8,000. The judgment does not split that sum between different heads of loss or record any separate remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Judgment refers only to 'Equality Act complaints'; classified as disability discrimination using the case context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure complaint; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal complaint was undefended and succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.