Case 1801672/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Cardy v George Wright Boutique Hotel and Bar and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801672/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Cardy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 4 April 2023. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal declared that the second respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of £3,333.33 for unpaid wages from October 2022, £2,923.07 for unpaid overtime, and £1,584.66 for accrued but unpaid holiday.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice pay and ordered the second respondent to pay damages of £1,538.46. In addition, it found that the second respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions as required by section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered compensation of four weeks’ gross pay at the statutory maximum, £2,284.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared the second respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, including unpaid wages from October 2022, unpaid overtime, and accrued but unpaid holiday. | Upheld | — | £7,841 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice pay and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £1,538 |
| Other | The tribunal found the second respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions required by section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered compensation of four weeks' gross pay at the statutory maximum. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,664
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.