Case 1801688/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person (with assistance from Mrs Winn, his wife) v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801688/2020
- Decision date
- 17 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
- Panel members
- Mr Q Shah, Mr M Elwin
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person (with assistance from Mrs Winn, his wife)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 15-17 September 2020 before Employment Judge Rogerson, sitting with lay members Mr Q Shah and Mr M Elwin. The claimant, Mr M Winn, appeared in person with assistance from Mrs Winn; the respondent was represented by Ms Twine, counsel.
The judgment dated 17 September 2020 records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and disability discrimination were withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of those complaints and does not award any compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.