Case 1801698/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Marshall v Rn Mechanical Limited ( in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801698/2019
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Marshall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rule 37. In a letter dated 15 May 2020, the tribunal gave Mr J Marshall an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that Mr Marshall had failed to obtain the administrator's consent and had not advised the tribunal of any steps he might be taking in that regard. He also failed to make written representations explaining why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal noted that, after a letter dated 15 May 2020, the claimant failed to obtain the administrator's consent, did not advise the tribunal of any steps being taken, and did not make written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.