Case 1801703/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Asquith v Renaissance Nurseries Leeds Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801703/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Asquith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms K Asquith, started work for Renaissance Nurseries Leeds Ltd on 7 November 2018 and had accrued 14 hours 30 minutes holiday when she resigned. She gave notice by email on 19 December 2018, her last day worked was 20 December 2018, and the nursery then closed for two weeks. The tribunal accepted that the claimant lost access to the respondent's electronic portal during her final week or shortly afterwards, so she could not see her final pay slip at the time payment was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay on termination succeeded and the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £116. | Upheld | — | £116 |
| Other | The complaint that the claimant was not provided with an itemised pay statement for the 11 January 2019 payment succeeded. The tribunal made no declaration as to the statement's terms because one was provided at the hearing, although it was inaccurate as to the payment date. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint concerning deductions for training was not pursued and was dismissed after the relevant training evidence was provided at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £116
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.