Case 1801714/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Carey v Mr David Mannion on behalf of the Committee of St Ann’s Club — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801714/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Carey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Brain found that Mrs M Carey had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal awarded damages of £1,775.76, described as the equivalent of 12 weeks' notice at a weekly rate of £147.98 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,439.40. The respondent was ordered to pay both sums on or before 3 July 2020. The judgment does not record any other claims, findings, or reduction in the awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £1,775.76, described as 12 weeks' notice at a weekly rate of £147.98 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,776 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,439.40. | Upheld | — | £4,439 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,215
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.