Case 1801722/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Haigh v Wastecare Limited AT A HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801722/2019
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Haigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 14 October 2019 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant, Mr R Haigh, appeared in person and the respondent, Wastecare Limited, was represented by Mr P Hunt, managing director.
The written judgment states that the claimant resigned. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the complaints of unfair and wrongful dismissal. No separate findings on remedy are recorded in the written decision.
The document notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted written record does not set out any legal test or detailed factual findings beyond the dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant resigned and dismisses the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant resigned and dismisses the wrongful dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.